Microfinance programs and better health: prospects for sub-Saharan Africa.
نویسندگان
چکیده
ALTHOUGH SOCIAL GRADIENTS IN MORBIDITY AND MORtality fromscrofula, rickets,andscarlet feverwerenoticedinEnglandasearlyas1845,currentunderstandingof therelationshipbetweenpovertyandillhealth is still evolving. A detailed examination of the social determinants of health is the current focus of a World Health OrganizationCommission,andaglobalagendathataddressestheoverlappingvulnerabilitiesofpoverty, social exclusion, andhealth recentlyhasbeenarticulated intheUnitedNationsMillennium Development Goals (MDG) framework. Sub-Saharan Africa remains the area of the world at greatest risk of failing to meet any MDG targets. Some experts suggest that conditions of extreme deprivation characterizing much of the region create “poverty traps” that limit access to proven interventions and constrain potential gains in employment, income, food, shelter, and education, carrying dire immediate and longer-term health consequences. The interdependence of poverty, health, and development might seem obvious, but cross-sectoral experience on how and where to intervene remains limited. Microfinance programs are increasingly at the center of this nexus, and new ideas can extend their potential benefits. Microfinance institutions (MFIs) provide poor households with access to financial services, allowing them to borrow and save in reliable and convenient forms. The success of the microfinance sector has been impressive. Across a wide variety of models, reported loan repayment rates, even among the poorest clients, often exceed 95%. Global experience has demonstrated that MFIs can recover all or most of their administrative costs through interest rates and user fees. Thus, rapid growth and wide scale are possible, even when donor funds are limited. By the end of 2005, more than 3000 MFIs were reported to have been providing services to 113 million clients, 84% of whom were women. The 2006 Nobel Peace Prize to Muhammad Yunus and Grameen Bank was given in recognition that microfinance also promises to effect social change. Small loans used for income generation have the potential to reduce poverty directly, while simultaneously catalyzing wider benefits including better health. At the most basic level, higher and steadier incomes make it easier to put food on the table each day. When health problems emerge, access to reliable ways to borrow and save can make it easier to pay for medicines and clinic visits. Financial access also can help individuals cope with unemployment caused by illness and forestall their need to sell off valuable assets. Thus, interventions to improve financial access may complement interventions to improve health conditions. Opportunities also are emerging for MFIs to broaden their scope and benefits that as yet remain largely unrealized. Microfinance institutions operate in villages, slums, and neighborhoods in which the lack of financial access is just one of many deprivations. In creating neighborhood-based associations of women that meet regularly and focus on tools to improve livelihoods, many MFIs may have the potential to more directly address health-related concerns. Doing so will not make sense for every institution and population, and microfinance leaders rightly have been wary of weighing down institutions with added responsibilities. But evidence is mounting to suggest that combining financial and health interventions can be powerful. These understandings are evolving, and expectations need to be realistic. Despite a tide of global optimism, beneficial effects of microfinance programs have not been witnessed in all contexts, and experimental evaluations, common in assessing health interventions, are virtually absent in the microfinance sector. Furthermore, although sub-Saharan Africa has the highest proportion of people living in extreme poverty, with more than 40% living on less than $1 per day, access to microfinance services remains extremely limited, extending to less than 10% of those who need it. In this Commentary, we discuss the global experience and availableevidenceonthepotential formicrofinance tocontribute toward achieving MDG targets, with specific reference to health gains, and we examine the challenges and opportunities forexpandingaccess tosuchservices insub-SaharanAfrica.
منابع مشابه
Is the Role of Physicians Really Evolving Due to Non-physician Clinicians Predominance in Staff Makeup in Sub-Saharan African Health Systems?; Comment on “Non-physician Clinicians in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Evolving Role of Physicians”
Health workforce shortages in Sub-Saharan Africa are widely recognized, particularly of physicians, leading the training and deployment of Non-physician clinicians (NPCs). The paper by Eyal et al provides interesting and legitimate viewpoints on evolving role of physicians in context of decisive increase of NPCss in Sub-Saharan Africa. Certainly, in short or mid-term, NPCs will continue to be a...
متن کاملSeriously Implementing Health Capacity Strengthening Programs in Africa; Comment on “Implementation of a Health Management Mentoring Program: Year-1 Evaluation of Its Impact on Health System Strengthening in Zambézia Province, Mozambique”
Faced with the challenges of healthcare reform, skills and new capabilities are needed to support the reform and it is of crucial importance in Africa where shortages affects the health system resilience. Edwards et al provides a good example of the challenge of implementing a mentoring program in one province in a sub-Saharan country. From this example, various aspects of strengthening the cap...
متن کاملNon-physician Clinicians – A Gain for Physicians’ Working in Sub-Saharan Africa; Comment on “Non-physician Clinicians in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Evolving Role of Physicians”
The changing demands on the health sectors in low- and middle-income countries especially sub-Saharan African countries continue to challenge efforts to address critical shortages of the health workforce. Addressing these challenges have led to the evolution of “non-physician clinicians” (NPCs), that assume some physician roles and thus mitigate the continuing shortage of doctors in these count...
متن کاملUniversal Access to Surgical Care and Sustainable Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case for Surgical Systems Research; Comment on “Global Surgery – Informing National Strategies for Scaling Up Surgery in Sub-Saharan Africa”
National level experiences, lessons learnt from the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) era coupled with the academic evidence and proposals generated by the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (LCoGS) together with the economic arguments and recommendations from the World Bank Group’s “Essential Surgery” Disease Control Priorities (DCP3) publication, provided the impetus for political commitment...
متن کاملLocal Research Catalyzes National Surgical Planning; Comment on “Global Surgery – Informing National Strategies for Scaling Up Surgery in Sub-Saharan Africa”
In 2015 the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (LCoGS) argued that surgical care is important to national health systems along with the economic viability of countries. Gajewski and colleagues outlined how the Commission’s blueprint has been implemented in sub-Saharan Africa, including two funded research projects that were integrated into national surgical plans. Here...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- JAMA
دوره 298 16 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007